Argument Between The Theistic And Atheistic Viewpoint

The argument between the theistic and atheistic viewpoint has been and always will be relevant. The relevance of this argument continues to carry over throughout generations because, as humans, we all have the desire to know the answers to the questions presented about life. We all want to be able to answer the hard questions, is God real? If the answer is yes, how did we come to that conclusion? H.J. McCloskey is the author of an article titled, â€Å"On Being an Atheist,† within this article he argues against the theistic viewpoint in hopes of shaking the theists conclusion that there is a divine creator. He answers the questions about God and his relevance to life by saying there is no God. He came to this conclusion by determining that if†¦show more content†¦He does not choose how we respond when faced with the decision of right and wrong because if he did there would be no choice to allow our free will to contemplate. Satan tempts humans by coating sins in the i llusion of happiness. We would not indulge in sin if it was presented to us as toxic as it actually is so Satan manipulates us by making it sound as if it will bring ultimate happiness. However, happiness is temporary and we all have the knowledge to access the sin that is presented in front of us and decide if it is right or wrong. We are given the choice through our free will to choose what is right or what is wrong and it is communicated to us through our moral conscience. William Lane Craig, a cosmological theist, firmly believes that an individual’s sense of morality exist because of God and his convictions. Theists believe that God often communicates His path through an individual’s moral compass, also known as that â€Å"still small voice†. When we choose wrong we allow evil to enter, misusing the gift God has allowed our minds to obtain. To a non-theistic mind McCloskey’s argument may have relevance but when someone who has knowledge on both theism and atheism analyzes the problem of evil the question regarding the worlds need for God without evil has to be considered. If God were to create all humans with the inability to make the mistake of falling into temptationShow MoreRelatedEssay on Right to Religion589 Words   |  3 Pagesparticular focus on the United States of America. The Right to Religion Basically, the right to religion involves the liberty to have as well as practice religion together with principles of one’s selection, encompassing theistic along with non-theistic beliefs in addition to atheistic beliefs. In this case, the right of religion covers freedom to practice one’s religion in terms of adoration, honoring and practice not leaving out teaching. However, this right to manifest a doctrine is contingent uponRead MoreThe And Evolution Between Creationism And Creationism1023 Words   |  5 PagesAmericans consider the controversy between creationism and evolution as existing on a dichotomous scale. This belief is inaccurate which is why the exercise of presenting the Creation/Evolution Continuum is highly successful both in middle and high school as well as universities. The continuum is not meant to change a student s beliefs or exalt one position over another, it is rather to demonstrate that there are many points of view and show the complexity of the argument (Scott, 2000). The continuumRead MorePhilosophical Analysis of a Non-Philosophical Stimulus1956 Words   |  8 Pageselements of his external world: but the photograph is the depiction of how the individual is still infinitely free in his capability to act and react to events: to choose and be responsible for his own actions. There are contradictory philosophical viewpoints, for example Freud might argue from a perspective of psychic determination. As Erich Fromm summarises, Freud might claim that ‘there is this secret, hidden, dissociated personality, and...this personality has a tremendous effect on everything weRead MoreExistentialism vs Essentialism23287 Words   |  94 Pagesor goal. In this sense, humans are free to choose their own destiny.   * is a philosophical term which asserts that there is a distinction between essential and non-essential (contingent or accidental) characteristics of an object. Essentialism assumes that objects have essences and that an object’s identity is its essence. Aristotle distinguished between an object’s essence and its existence. Its essence is â€Å"what a thing is.† Its essence is â€Å"that a thing is.† An object’s essence is the collection